A Sample Essay On Hedonism Ethical Theory Essay

Hedonism

“Hedonism” is a Greek terminology that signifies "joy." Holding joy is the most noteworthy or just inherently good. Hedonism states that each person should attempt to create the highest amount of pleasure for themselves in each action they make. Wisdom, knowledge, intelligence, love, and gratitude are examples of the ends to which we should seek for the qualitative value over the quantitative sense (Sumner, 2017). Inside the criminal justice field of considering old style hypotheses, hedonism is best comprehended to be a focal point of personal human practices and is focused on an individual's longing to boost their pleasure while limiting their agony. Gratification followed back to numerous old civic establishments, and there are various types of hedonism. The two most contemplated and significant examples of debauchery are that of an ethical point of view and psychological nature (Banks, 2018). Jeremy Bentham and Cesare Beccaria are the originators of old-style criminology and trust that culprits perpetrate demonstrations of their own choice and will either carry out wrongdoing or not founded on what they regard pleasurable versus excruciating. This paper aims at exploring the hedonism ethical theory and comment on its application in criminal justice.

Types of Hedonism

Psychological hedonism is, at times, considered to be inspirational hedonism. It is defined as the view that people are mentally built so that they solely want delight (Garson, 2016). The hypothesis incorporates every single positive inclination or encounters, for example, euphoria, fulfillment, rapture, happiness, ecstasy, and so on. Mental indulgence is generally initiated as a case about what specialists accept or take to be delight delivering and torment reducing.   

Ethical hedonism is defined as the regularizing guarantee that people look for joy and stay away from agony. The possibility that all individuals reserve the privilege to give it their best shot to accomplish the best measure of happiness conceivable to them (Banks, 2018). Each pleasure ought to far outperform their benchmark of torment. Joy is expressed to be the main tremendous, and pain is just underhanded. Moral debauchery is the perspective on important moral commitment is to amplify delight or satisfaction.

Crimes and Punishment

In the criminal equity framework, the two types of hedonism are connected to assess the ethical and untrustworthy practices of criminal equity. The framework depends on the hedonism theories based on the inspiration headed to accomplish joy, joy being disposal crimes in the general public (Banks, 2018). Gratification is observing and breaking down the practices of the crooks, recommending that every individual has an alternative perspective, investigating, and acting. Hedonism can be utilized to assess the activities of criminals, which the significance of understanding Gratification is essential to esteem, realizing the right actions is gainful of delight while an illegal business is profitable of agony.

Hedonism assumes a job in present-day criminology hypothesis by connecting criminal behavior as extroversion (actual conduct) and neuroticism (unsteady manner). Neuropsychological of gratification underlies the belief, the longing to accomplish joy over torment and frail proper restraint lead to violations, clarifying why everybody is not a criminal (Banks, 2018). Indulgence came to underlie hypotheses of the pathology of wrongdoing in positivist criminology and human science, characterizing that crooks are unfit to control their wants for delight and concede to satisfaction through discretion. Unlawful conduct in their discretion hypothesis of misconduct, the propensity to seek after immediate, transient satisfaction, the little worry of long-haul outcomes of their activities, in light of a self-intrigued quest for delight and shirking of agony.  Indulgence has played a factor in hypotheses of cultural criminology with the endeavor to clarify the ascent in fierce violations and loathe wrongdoings.

Hedonist Believes

Robert Nozick, a modern-day philosopher, explained an example of how a hedonist believes by illustrating an experience machine in which one could plug into an escape, mentally, from the real world (Sumner, 2017). It would provide a real-life experience that allows for the most pleasure for the user. While connected to this machine, the user’s body would remain in the real world and be preserved, while in your mind, you have forgotten about the real world altogether. What would you choose? If you would select this fake life, then you are a true hedonist, for the ends for which you seek, is your pleasure. If you believe that there is more to life than desire and would be uncomfortable in abandoning your real life, you would not be a hedonist.

Epicurus, an ancient philosopher, believes that there were two types of pleasure that people seek after. Kinetic pleasure is the basic sensations one feels after being exposed to a particular stimulant and may include physical pleasure brought on from a massage or drinking alcohol. On the other hand, katastematic comfort is the contentment that comes from activities that have a higher level of experience (McMahon, 2017). These pleasures are based on their qualitative value, like the gaining of wisdom, or the joy of teaching a child to read. These pleasures are not enjoyable because of the action itself, but what consequence that arises from that action, like being more apt to live an independent life.

Theory Application

It is enjoyable or preferred in a hedonistic viewpoint, to be well established and stable in one’s life. Having an athletic career will help a person to feel secure in their life and allow for more autonomy in general. Being the president, one would call a meeting with those who are casting a poor light on the company and find out precisely what they desire the company to do. If feasible, one would accommodate their requests, and through in something extra, like providing additional money for textbooks, or to support the art department in the schools. This approach would show the company’s reasonable faith effort to remain fair and still provide an excellent opportunity for the children. In turn, this will keep your security, which is a natural desire for all.

Conclusion

In conclusion, hedonism theories contribute to the criminal equity framework. Psychological hedonism refers to the view that people are mentally built so that we only want delight. On the other hand, ethical hedonism, the possibility that all individuals reserve the privilege to do their absolute best to accomplish the best measure of enjoyment conceivable to them. Each type of gratification is connected to lift the moral and illegal practices of the criminal equity framework. Compared to screen and examine the methods of the offenders, understanding that every individual has an alternate type of reasoning, dissecting, and acting. 

References

Banks, C. (2018). Criminal justice ethics: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Garson, J. (2016). Two types of psychological hedonism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56, 7-14.

McMahon, J. A. (2017). From Kantianism to aesthetic hedonism: Aesthetic pleasure revised. Australasian Philosophical Review, 1(1), 1-5.

Sumner, L. W. (2017). Feldman’s hedonism. In The good, the right, life, and death (pp. 83-100). Routledge.